Pop Culture
Reconciliation Games
The Canberra Times, 2 November 2000
What does Cathy Freeman have in common with Neil Armstrong?
Like the moon landing, all Australians who were old enough
will remember where they were when Freeman won her Olympic
gold medal. Sure, it was just over a month ago, but I'll bet
that, even in 20 years time, we'll all remember.
Much weight was placed on Freeman's win. People throughout
Australia, whatever their colour or politics, were all cheering
for a woman who had been outspoken in her pride of her Aboriginality.
Even the Prime Minister was there, at Olympic Park, to applaud
a descendent of the "stolen generation" he tries
to ignore. It was, we all thought, a major step towards reconciliation.
Sadly, for the meantime, the Government seems to have blown
its chance. The PM has used the Games to trivialise everything,
suggesting that the country doesn't have any problems. Outmoded
flag? Gee, everyone cheered it during the Olympics. Anti-migrant
hostility? Of course not. We embraced Tatiana and Jelena into
our family. Aboriginal-white tensions? Nonsense! Everyone
loves Cathy, don't they?
But despite all the PM's best efforts, Sydney 2000 might
still be remembered as the Reconciliation Games. Not that
it had much to with Freeman's 400-metre run, inspiring though
it was, or even the Olympics proper. I'm talking about the
OTHER "best Games ever".
The Paralympic Games had given us few superstars. Before
Sydney, we had Louise Sauvage, which is one more than most
nations. Even the U.S., which usually wins the medal tally,
does not accord their Paralympians celebrity status. It is
a sad truth that these Games are not as popular as the Olympics,
and two reasons come to mind.
Firstly, we look up to Olympians the same way that kids look
up to comic-book heroes. They even have skin-tight suits,
superhuman abilities, and crimefighting names like Superfish
and Thorpedo. Disabled athletes, however, can hardly be considered
superhuman. (Sauvage is an exception. She can't walk, but
with an athletic record like hers, walking's for losers.)
OK, but then there's the OTHER reason why Paralympians are
so underrated. Whatever you have just read, we love the Olympians
because they ARE normal people. The Thorpedo's secret identity
is the likeable, mild-mannered young Ian Thorpe. Paralympians,
we tend to think, could never be this normal.
This is a peculiar idea, as most interviews with high-profile
Paralympians will show that they are as normal as any elite
athlete. Which means: they're crazy, but that's OK. (Consider
Canadian athlete Chantelle Petticlerc's admission that she
dreams of Sauvage, her great rival, more than she dreams of
her boyfriend. Spoken like a true champion!)
Many people were dismissive of the Paralympics, saying that
it didn't compare to the Olympics. "None of them can
run 100 metres in under 10 seconds, that's for sure,"
said one friend. Well no, but neither can Marion Jones. Besides,
many elite athletes would love to run as fast on two good
legs as Neil Fuller runs on one.
Another friend even said (get this) that wheelchair athletes
can't be taken seriously, because they have no choice but
to use wheelchairs. (Did you get that?) The lamer the excuses,
more apparent is the sad truth: people still feel uncomfortable
about disabled people.
Surprising? Not really. If we saw sprinter Lisa McIntosh
a few weeks ago, her arm twisted and voice slurred by cerebral
palsy, we might have tried to avoid her. Watching her win
any of her three gold medals, however, we were proud to be
from the same country. And perhaps a little educated.
Then there are the intellectually disabled. We like to make
fun of them. But no Olympic gold story -- not Michael Diamond's
tears to his father, nor even the tragedies suffered by our
men's madison cycling team -- was quite as heart-rending as
Siobhan Paton's. After years of being tormented and called
a "retard", she wins six gold medals and is put
up as a female answer to Australia's most popular guy, the
Thorpedo. (She doesn't have a silly nickname yet, but we'll
think of something.) And as she proves in interviews, her
disability does not make her "dumb". (George W Bush
is dumb. Paton is intellectually disabled.) Perhaps Paton,
more than Freeman, is the face of reconciliation at Sydney
2000.
Why? Because, buoyed with local Olympic spirit, we suddenly
cared. Over the space of the last fortnight, the world's second-largest
sports event has suddenly brought us superstars galore. These
people are as normal as any Olympian, and people like Paton,
Sauvage and McIntosh are as superhuman as the best ones.
But while I was happy that Australia won the medals tally,
I was actually disappointed by our dominance. Here was one
of those rare occasions when the world should take Australia's
lead.
|